Vs > Invercargill
| Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Invercargill Climate & Distance Between | |
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Ranong, Thailand
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Pescara, Abruzzo, Italy
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Mahackala, Russia
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Chesterfield, Nunavut, Canada
Invercargill vs Watertown, Wi, Usa
Invercargill vs Taunggyi, Myanmar
Invercargill vs Umnugovi, Mongolia
Invercargill vs Totara Flat, New Zealand
Nagua vs Vigna Di Valle
Bowling Green, Mo vs Asyut
Ciudad Real vs Abu Dhabi
Saint Petersburg vs Comitan
- The distance between Lower Hutt, Gracefield, New Zealand and Invercargill, New Zealand is approximately 783 km or 487 mi.
- To reach Lower Hutt, Gracefield in this distance one would set out from Invercargill bearing 44.8° or NE and follow the great circles arc to approach Lower Hutt, Gracefield bearing 40.3° or NE .
- Both have a marine west coast climate (Cfb).
- Lower Hutt, Gracefield is in or near the warm temperate thorn steppe biome whereas Invercargill is in or near the cool temperate desert scrub biome.
- The average temperature is 3.2 °C (5.8°F) warmer.
- Average monthly temperatures vary by 0.1 °C (0.2°F) less in Lower Hutt, Gracefield. The continentality subtype is barely hyperoceanic for both.
- Total annual precipitation averages 233.9 mm (9.2 in) more which is equivalent to 233.9 l/m² (5.74 US gal/ft²) or 2,339,000 l/ha (250,055 US gal/ac) more. About 1 2/9 as much.
- The altitude of the sun at midday is overall 5.2° higher in Lower Hutt, Gracefield than in Invercargill.
Climate Comparison Table
The table shows values for Lower Hutt, Gracefield relative to Invercargill. You can also view this comparison the other way around from the perspective of Invercargill vs Lower Hutt, Gracefield.
| |
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
Apr |
May |
Jun |
Jul |
Aug |
Sep |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
|
Annual |
| Average Temperature °C ( °F) |
+3 (+6) |
+4 (+6) |
+4 (+7) |
+4 (+6) |
+4 (+7) |
+4 (+7) |
+3 (+6) |
+3 (+5) |
+3 (+5) |
+3 (+5) |
+3 (+5) |
+3 (+5) |
|
+3 (+6) |
| Average Precipitation mm (in) |
-38 (-1) |
-13 (-1) |
-1 (0) |
+5 (+0) |
+26 (+1) |
+47 (+2) |
+81 (+3) |
+77 (+3) |
+33 (+1) |
+8 (+0) |
+6 (+0) |
+3 (+0) |
|
+234 (+9) |
| Average Daylight Hours & Minutes/ Day |
-0h 32' |
-0h 19' |
-0h 03' |
+0h 13' |
+0h 28' |
+0h 37' |
+0h 33' |
+0h 19' |
+0h 03' |
-0h 13' |
-0h 29' |
-0h 37' |
|
0h 00' |
| Sun altitude at solar noon on the 21st day (°) |
+5.1 |
+5.2 |
+5.2 |
+5.2 |
+5.2 |
+5.2 |
+5.2 |
+5.2 |
+5.2 |
+5.1 |
+5.1 |
+5.2 |
| +5.2 |
There are so many comparison pages. Please post a link to one to help people find them:
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Bristol/ Tri City, Tn, Usa
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Amsterdam Island, French Southern Lands
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Iqaluit, Nt, Canada
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Evora, Portugal
Invercargill vs Moncton, Nb, Canada
Invercargill vs Lake Coleridge, New Zealand
Invercargill vs Salem, Or, Usa
Invercargill vs Porto-Nacional, Brazil
Hiroo vs Albany, Ga
Choluteca vs Quanah, Tx
Nago vs Geraldton, Western Australia
Sedan, Ks vs Big Rapids Waterworks, Mi
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Invercargill Discussion
You are welcome to incorporate your thoughts on the differences in climate or other matters such as contrasts in culture, standard of living, demographics etc.
|