Vs > Picos
 | Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Picos Climate & Distance Between |  |
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Leh, Jammu And Kashmir, India
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Joao Pinheiro, Brazil
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Cita/ Kadala, Russia
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Sydney (airport), Australia
Picos vs Le Mans, France
Picos vs Ciudad Real, Spain
Picos vs Hakkari, Turkey
Picos vs Mitilini, Greece
Cook, South Australia vs Waitarere Forest
Guam vs Pasni, Balochistan
Msekera Agromet vs Vaasa
Cheb vs Manaia Dem Farm
- The distance between Lower Hutt, Gracefield, New Zealand and Picos, Brazil is approximately 13,490 km or 8,383 mi.
- To reach Lower Hutt, Gracefield in this distance one would set out from Picos bearing 211.5° or SSW
 and follow the great circles arc to approach Lower Hutt, Gracefield bearing 316.4° or NW .
- Lower Hutt, Gracefield has a marine west coast climate (Cfb) whereas Picos has a subtropical hot steppe climate (BSh).
- Lower Hutt, Gracefield is in or near the warm temperate thorn steppe biome whereas Picos is in or near the subtropical dry forest biome.
- The average annual temperature is 16.3 °C (29.3°F) cooler.
- Average monthly temperatures vary by 3.7 °C (6.7°F) more in Lower Hutt, Gracefield. The continentality subtype is barely hyperoceanic as opposed to truly hyperoceanic.
- Total annual precipitation averages 503.2 mm (19.8 in) more which is equivalent to 503.2 l/m² (12.35 US gal/ft²) or 5,032,000 l/ha (537,954 US gal/ac) more. About 1 5/8 as much.
- The altitude of the sun at midday is overall 25.6° lower in Lower Hutt, Gracefield than in Picos.
Climate Comparison Table
The table shows values for Lower Hutt, Gracefield relative to Picos. You can also view this comparison the other way around from the perspective of Picos vs Lower Hutt, Gracefield.
| | |
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
Apr |
May |
Jun |
Jul |
Aug |
Sep |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
|
Annual |
 | Average Temperature °C ( °F) |
-9 (-17) |
-9 (-16) |
-11 (-19) |
-12 (-22) |
-15 (-26) |
-16 (-30) |
-18 (-32) |
-18 (-32) |
-18 (-32) |
-17 (-30) |
-17 (-30) |
-14 (-24) |
|
-16 (-26) |
 | Average Precipitation mm (in) |
-53 (-2) |
-76 (-3) |
-89 (-3) |
-3 (0) |
+111 (+4) |
+133 (+5) |
+151 (+6) |
+139 (+5) |
+107 (+4) |
+76 (+3) |
+27 (+1) |
-19 (-1) |
|
+503 (+20) |
 | Average Daylight Hours & Minutes/ Day |
+2h 14' |
+1h 23' |
+0h 15' |
-0h 57' |
-1h 59' |
-2h 30' |
-2h 16' |
-1h 23' |
-0h 13' |
+0h 59' |
+2h 00' |
+2h 31' |
|
0h 00' |
 | Sun altitude at solar noon on the 21st day (°) |
-8.4 |
-25.9 |
-33.8 |
-34 |
-34 |
-34.1 |
-34.2 |
-34.3 |
-34.2 |
-25.5 |
-8.2 |
-1.4 |
| -25.6 |
There are so many comparison pages. Please post a link to one to help people find them:
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Valley, Uk
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs North Bend, Oregon, Usa
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Rundu, Kavango, Namibia
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Camilo Daza, Colombia
Picos vs Albany, Western Australia, Australia
Picos vs Shantou, China
Picos vs Manhattan, Ks, Usa
Picos vs Imperatriz, Brazil
Irozaki vs Nara
Aracaju vs Skiros Island
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan vs Itirucu
Dudinka vs Anderson, Sc
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Picos Discussion
You are welcome to incorporate your thoughts on the differences in climate or other matters such as contrasts in culture, standard of living, demographics etc.
|
This site may contain signs of a lockdown.
