Vs > Quang Tri
| Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Quang Tri Climate & Distance Between | |
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Lusaka, Zambia
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Soure, Brazil
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Albany, Ga, Usa
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Xankandi, Azerbaijan
Quang Tri vs Makurazaki, Japan
Quang Tri vs La Rioja, Argentina
Quang Tri vs Aleppo, Syria
Quang Tri vs Laurel, Md, Usa
San J. Ocoa vs Albenga
Shingle Point, Yt vs Vitebsk
Alghero vs Grafton, Nd
Eskridge, Ks vs Washington, District Of Columbia
- The distance between Lower Hutt, Gracefield, New Zealand and Quang Tri, Vietnam is approximately 9,477 km or 5,889 mi.
- To reach Lower Hutt, Gracefield in this distance one would set out from Quang Tri bearing 135.7° or SE and follow the great circles arc to approach Lower Hutt, Gracefield bearing 117.2° or ESE .
- Lower Hutt, Gracefield has a marine west coast climate (Cfb) whereas Quang Tri has a tropical monsoonal climate (Am).
- Lower Hutt, Gracefield is in or near the warm temperate thorn steppe biome whereas Quang Tri is in or near the tropical moist forest biome.
- The average annual temperature is 12.2 °C (21.9°F) cooler.
- Average monthly temperatures vary by 0.9 °C (1.6°F) less in Lower Hutt, Gracefield. The continentality subtype is barely hyperoceanic for both.
- Total annual precipitation averages 1224.4 mm (48.2 in) less which is equivalent to 1224.4 l/m² (30.05 US gal/ft²) or 12,244,000 l/ha (1,308,965 US gal/ac) less. About 1/2 as much.
- The altitude of the sun at midday is overall 22.9° lower in Lower Hutt, Gracefield than in Quang Tri.
Climate Comparison Table
The table shows values for Lower Hutt, Gracefield relative to Quang Tri. You can also view this comparison the other way around from the perspective of Quang Tri vs Lower Hutt, Gracefield.
| |
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
Apr |
May |
Jun |
Jul |
Aug |
Sep |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
|
Annual |
| Average Temperature °C ( °F) |
-3 (-5) |
-4 (-7) |
-6 (-11) |
-13 (-23) |
-17 (-31) |
-20 (-36) |
-21 (-37) |
-20 (-36) |
-17 (-30) |
-13 (-23) |
-9 (-17) |
-5 (-8) |
|
-12 (-22) |
| Average Precipitation mm (in) |
-96 (-4) |
+6 (+0) |
+23 (+1) |
+55 (+2) |
+38 (+1) |
+66 (+3) |
+69 (+3) |
+43 (+2) |
-282 (-11) |
-463 (-18) |
-478 (-19) |
-205 (-8) |
|
-1224 (-48) |
| Average Daylight Hours & Minutes/ Day |
+3h 29' |
+2h 09' |
+0h 23' |
-1h 29' |
-3h 05' |
-3h 53' |
-3h 32' |
-2h 09' |
-0h 20' |
+1h 32' |
+3h 07' |
+3h 54' |
|
0h 00' |
| Sun altitude at solar noon on the 21st day (°) |
+15.3 |
-3.2 |
-24.8 |
-48.1 |
-57.8 |
-57.9 |
-57.7 |
-48.7 |
-25.9 |
-3.2 |
+15.2 |
+22.4 |
| -22.9 |
There are so many comparison pages. Please post a link to one to help people find them:
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Shinjo, Japan
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Carolina, Brazil
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Concordia, Kansas, Usa
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Mcpherson, Ks, Usa
Quang Tri vs Yanji, China
Quang Tri vs Palmerston N (aero), New Zealand
Quang Tri vs Basco, Philippines
Quang Tri vs Crotone, Calabria, Italy
Lewiston, Me vs Yuma, Arizona
Pocahontas, Ar vs Cipo
Antsiranana vs Cluj
London, England vs Hachinohe
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Quang Tri Discussion
You are welcome to incorporate your thoughts on the differences in climate or other matters such as contrasts in culture, standard of living, demographics etc.
|