Vs > Stensele
| Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Stensele Climate & Distance Between | |
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs New Orleans Audubon, La, Usa
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Berkeley, Ca, Usa
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs State College, Pa, Usa
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Madrid (b), Spain
Stensele vs Low Head, Australia
Stensele vs Maine Soroa, Niger
Stensele vs Jakarta, Java, Indonesia
Stensele vs Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Usa
Rio De Janeiro vs Santa Maria Di Leuc
Zinder vs Mersin
Nagoya vs Vrfu Omu
Dakhla vs Vardo, Finnmark
- The distance between Lower Hutt, Gracefield, New Zealand and Stensele, Sweden is approximately 17,013 km or 10,572 mi.
- To reach Lower Hutt, Gracefield in this distance one would set out from Stensele bearing 38.9° or NE and follow the great circles arc to approach Lower Hutt, Gracefield bearing 159.4° or SSE .
- Lower Hutt, Gracefield has a marine west coast climate (Cfb) whereas Stensele has a boreal subarctic climate with no dry season (Dfc).
- Lower Hutt, Gracefield is in or near the warm temperate thorn steppe biome whereas Stensele is in or near the boreal wet forest biome.
- The average annual temperature is 12.6 °C (22.7°F) warmer.
- Average monthly temperatures vary by 17.7 °C (31.9°F) less in Lower Hutt, Gracefield. The continentality subtype is barely hyperoceanic as opposed to subcontinental.
- Total annual precipitation averages 786.6 mm (31 in) more which is equivalent to 786.6 l/m² (19.31 US gal/ft²) or 7,866,000 l/ha (840,928 US gal/ac) more. About 2 1/2 as much.
- The altitude of the sun at midday is overall 23.1° higher in Lower Hutt, Gracefield than in Stensele.
Climate Comparison Table
The table shows values for Lower Hutt, Gracefield relative to Stensele. You can also view this comparison the other way around from the perspective of Stensele vs Lower Hutt, Gracefield.
| |
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
Apr |
May |
Jun |
Jul |
Aug |
Sep |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
|
Annual |
| Average Temperature °C ( °F) |
+30 (+54) |
+28 (+50) |
+22 (+40) |
+14 (+26) |
+5 (+9) |
-2 (-4) |
-5 (-9) |
-2 (-4) |
+4 (+8) |
+11 (+19) |
+20 (+35) |
+26 (+47) |
|
+13 (+23) |
| Average Precipitation mm (in) |
+40 (+2) |
+37 (+1) |
+64 (+3) |
+85 (+3) |
+101 (+4) |
+88 (+3) |
+70 (+3) |
+75 (+3) |
+59 (+2) |
+56 (+2) |
+47 (+2) |
+65 (+3) |
|
+787 (+31) |
| Average Daylight Hours & Minutes/ Day |
+10h 02' |
+5h 46' |
+1h 01' |
-3h 55' |
-8h 37' |
-11h 45' |
-10h 14' |
-5h 47' |
-0h 53' |
+4h 03' |
+8h 45' |
+11h 46' |
|
0h 00' |
| Sun altitude at solar noon on the 21st day (°) |
+63.4 |
+44.8 |
+23.3 |
+0.1 |
-16.5 |
-23 |
-17.1 |
-0.4 |
+22.4 |
+45 |
+63.3 |
+70.4 |
| +23.1 |
There are so many comparison pages. Please post a link to one to help people find them:
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Okhotsk, Russia
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Marrakech, Morocco
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Dezful, Iran
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Laramie, Wy, Usa
Stensele vs Dallas, Texas, Usa
Stensele vs Treinta Y Tres, Uruguay
Stensele vs Medan, Sumatra, Indonesia
Stensele vs Santiago R., Dominican Republic
Jaguaruana vs Belém
Chupungnyong vs Sault Ste. Marie, Mi
Saki vs Banjul
Pipestone, Mn vs Chupungnyong
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Stensele Discussion
You are welcome to incorporate your thoughts on the differences in climate or other matters such as contrasts in culture, standard of living, demographics etc.
|