Vs > Ceahlau
| Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Ceahlau Climate & Distance Between | |
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Pirenopolis, Brazil
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Duverge, Dominican Republic
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Camaguey, Cuba
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Busan, South Korea
Ceahlau vs Belfast-Aldergrove, Uk
Ceahlau vs Barra Do Corda, Brazil
Ceahlau vs Nashville, Tennessee, Usa
Ceahlau vs Carrasco, Uruguay
Waddington vs Albert Lea, Mn
Misratah vs Belo Horizonte
Kalispell, Montana vs Big Trout Lake, On
Birzai vs Chita
- The distance between Lower Hutt, Gracefield, New Zealand and Ceahlau, Romania is approximately 17,473 km or 10,858 mi.
- To reach Lower Hutt, Gracefield in this distance one would set out from Ceahlau bearing 86.7° or E and follow the great circles arc to approach Lower Hutt, Gracefield bearing 115.2° or ESE .
- Lower Hutt, Gracefield has a marine west coast climate (Cfb) whereas Ceahlau has a warm summer continental/ hemiboreal climate with no dry season (Dfb).
- Lower Hutt, Gracefield is in or near the warm temperate thorn steppe biome whereas Ceahlau is in or near the boreal wet forest biome.
- The average annual temperature is 5.3 °C (9.6°F) warmer.
- Average monthly temperatures vary by 12.9 °C (23.2°F) less in Lower Hutt, Gracefield. The continentality subtype is barely hyperoceanic as opposed to subcontinental.
- Total annual precipitation averages 712.6 mm (28.1 in) more which is equivalent to 712.6 l/m² (17.49 US gal/ft²) or 7,126,000 l/ha (761,817 US gal/ac) more. About 2 1/6 as much.
- The altitude of the sun at midday is overall 5.1° higher in Lower Hutt, Gracefield than in Ceahlau.
Climate Comparison Table
The table shows values for Lower Hutt, Gracefield relative to Ceahlau. You can also view this comparison the other way around from the perspective of Ceahlau vs Lower Hutt, Gracefield.
| |
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
Apr |
May |
Jun |
Jul |
Aug |
Sep |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
|
Annual |
| Average Temperature °C ( °F) |
+21 (+37) |
+20 (+36) |
+15 (+27) |
+6 (+11) |
-2 (-4) |
-7 (-12) |
-9 (-17) |
-9 (-15) |
-3 (-5) |
+4 (+7) |
+11 (+20) |
+17 (+30) |
|
+5 (+10) |
| Average Precipitation mm (in) |
+48 (+2) |
+26 (+1) |
+74 (+3) |
+66 (+3) |
+57 (+2) |
+27 (+1) |
+74 (+3) |
+68 (+3) |
+75 (+3) |
+67 (+3) |
+52 (+2) |
+79 (+3) |
|
+713 (+28) |
| Average Daylight Hours & Minutes/ Day |
+5h 50' |
+3h 35' |
+0h 39' |
-2h 28' |
-5h 09' |
-6h 32' |
-5h 55' |
-3h 36' |
-0h 33' |
+2h 33' |
+5h 13' |
+6h 32' |
|
0h 00' |
| Sun altitude at solar noon on the 21st day (°) |
+45.5 |
+26.9 |
+5.4 |
-17.9 |
-34.5 |
-41 |
-35.1 |
-18.4 |
+4.4 |
+27 |
+45.4 |
+52.6 |
| +5.1 |
There are so many comparison pages. Please post a link to one to help people find them:
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Watertown, Sd, Usa
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs San Jose, Costa Rica
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Collooney, Sligo, Ireland
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Koumac, New Caledonia
Ceahlau vs Ohotsk, Russia
Ceahlau vs Tomb, Mali
Ceahlau vs Lansdowne House, On, Canada
Ceahlau vs Eldoret, Kenya
Saint Peter, Mn vs Independence, Ks
La Vega vs Riga
Bikaner vs Tsuyama
Cherrapunji vs Franca
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Ceahlau Discussion
You are welcome to incorporate your thoughts on the differences in climate or other matters such as contrasts in culture, standard of living, demographics etc.
|