Vs > Omaezaki
| Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Omaezaki Climate & Distance Between | |
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Sodankyla, Lapland, Finland
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Decimomannu, Italy
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Svalbard Lufthavn, Norway
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Park Rapids, Mn, Usa
Omaezaki vs Sioux City, Ia, Usa
Omaezaki vs Gourdon, France
Omaezaki vs Phrae, Thailand
Omaezaki vs Jyvskyl, Finland
Bir Moghrein vs Zamboanga, Mindanao
Segou vs Yerevan/ Zvartnots
West Point, Ga vs Conceição do Mato Dentro, Minas Gerais
Murmansk vs Vytegra
- The distance between Lower Hutt, Gracefield, New Zealand and Omaezaki, Japan is approximately 9,227 km or 5,734 mi.
- To reach Lower Hutt, Gracefield in this distance one would set out from Omaezaki bearing 153.1° or SSE and follow the great circles arc to approach Lower Hutt, Gracefield bearing 150.3° or SSE .
- Lower Hutt, Gracefield has a marine west coast climate (Cfb) whereas Omaezaki has a humid subtropical climate (Cfa).
- Lower Hutt, Gracefield is in or near the warm temperate thorn steppe biome whereas Omaezaki is in or near the warm temperate wet forest biome.
- The average annual temperature is 2.8 °C (5°F) cooler.
- Average monthly temperatures vary by 11.5 °C (20.7°F) less in Lower Hutt, Gracefield. The continentality subtype is barely hyperoceanic as opposed to semicontinental.
- Total annual precipitation averages 738.1 mm (29.1 in) less which is equivalent to 738.1 l/m² (18.11 US gal/ft²) or 7,381,000 l/ha (789,078 US gal/ac) less. About 2/3 as much.
- The altitude of the sun at midday is overall 7.3° lower in Lower Hutt, Gracefield than in Omaezaki.
Climate Comparison Table
The table shows values for Lower Hutt, Gracefield relative to Omaezaki. You can also view this comparison the other way around from the perspective of Omaezaki vs Lower Hutt, Gracefield.
| |
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
Apr |
May |
Jun |
Jul |
Aug |
Sep |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
|
Annual |
| Average Temperature °C ( °F) |
+11 (+20) |
+11 (+19) |
+7 (+13) |
0 (-1) |
-7 (-12) |
-12 (-21) |
-16 (-28) |
-17 (-30) |
-13 (-23) |
-6 (-12) |
+0 (+0) |
+7 (+13) |
|
-3 (-5) |
| Average Precipitation mm (in) |
-3 (0) |
-36 (-1) |
-74 (-3) |
-79 (-3) |
-80 (-3) |
-138 (-5) |
-65 (-3) |
-76 (-3) |
-97 (-4) |
-72 (-3) |
-47 (-2) |
+30 (+1) |
|
-738 (-29) |
| Average Daylight Hours & Minutes/ Day |
+4h 38' |
+2h 52' |
+0h 31' |
-1h 59' |
-4h 06' |
-5h 11' |
-4h 42' |
-2h 53' |
-0h 27' |
+2h 03' |
+4h 09' |
+5h 11' |
|
0h 00' |
| Sun altitude at solar noon on the 21st day (°) |
+33.2 |
+14.6 |
-6.9 |
-30.2 |
-46.8 |
-53.4 |
-47.5 |
-31 |
-8.1 |
+14.6 |
+33 |
+40.2 |
| -7.3 |
There are so many comparison pages. Please post a link to one to help people find them:
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Djibouti, Djibouti
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Chimbay, Uzbekistan
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Krenkel Polar (Isl), Russia
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Marina Di Ginosa, Italy
Omaezaki vs Veraval, India
Omaezaki vs Sacramento, California, Usa
Omaezaki vs Baltimore, Md, Usa
Omaezaki vs Wairakei, New Zealand
Smolensk vs Kybartai
Port Angeles, Wa vs Buckhannon, Wv
Crateus vs Yurimaguas
Sheridan, Wy vs Newberry, Mi
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Omaezaki Discussion
You are welcome to incorporate your thoughts on the differences in climate or other matters such as contrasts in culture, standard of living, demographics etc.
|