Vs > Vitebsk
| Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Vitebsk Climate & Distance Between | |
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs North Salang, Afghanistan
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs S. P. Macoris, Dominican Republic
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Arbaat, Sudan
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Providenja Bay, Russia
Vitebsk vs Reykjavík, Iceland
Vitebsk vs Ouallene Bordj, Algeria
Vitebsk vs San Juan Bautista, Paraguay
Vitebsk vs Kirensk, Russia
Zanjan vs Grenoble
Florania vs Albion, Ne
Grants Pass, Or vs Winnibigoshish Dam, Mn
MONTREAL/ DORVAL, Qc vs Homer, Ak
- The distance between Lower Hutt, Gracefield, New Zealand and Vitebsk, Belarus is approximately 17,015 km or 10,573 mi.
- To reach Lower Hutt, Gracefield in this distance one would set out from Vitebsk bearing 73.5° or ENE and follow the great circles arc to approach Lower Hutt, Gracefield bearing 133.4° or SE .
- Lower Hutt, Gracefield has a marine west coast climate (Cfb) whereas Vitebsk has a warm summer continental/ hemiboreal climate with no dry season (Dfb).
- Lower Hutt, Gracefield is in or near the warm temperate thorn steppe biome whereas Vitebsk is in or near the cool temperate moist forest biome.
- The annual average temperature is 8 °C (14.4°F) warmer.
- Average monthly temperatures vary by 16.7 °C (30.1°F) less in Lower Hutt, Gracefield. The continentality subtype is barely hyperoceanic as opposed to subcontinental.
- Total annual precipitation averages 652.6 mm (25.7 in) more which is equivalent to 652.6 l/m² (16.02 US gal/ft²) or 6,526,000 l/ha (697,673 US gal/ac) more. About 2 as much.
- The altitude of the sun at midday is overall 13.3° higher in Lower Hutt, Gracefield than in Vitebsk.
Climate Comparison Table
The table shows values for Lower Hutt, Gracefield relative to Vitebsk. You can also view this comparison the other way around from the perspective of Vitebsk vs Lower Hutt, Gracefield.
| |
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
Apr |
May |
Jun |
Jul |
Aug |
Sep |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
|
Annual |
| Average Temperature °C ( °F) |
+26 (+46) |
+24 (+44) |
+18 (+33) |
+8 (+15) |
-1 (-2) |
-6 (-12) |
-8 (-15) |
-7 (-12) |
0 (0) |
+7 (+12) |
+14 (+26) |
+21 (+37) |
|
+8 (+14) |
| Average Precipitation mm (in) |
+36 (+1) |
+32 (+1) |
+53 (+2) |
+72 (+3) |
+85 (+3) |
+63 (+2) |
+66 (+3) |
+67 (+3) |
+49 (+2) |
+50 (+2) |
+32 (+1) |
+48 (+2) |
|
+653 (+26) |
| Average Daylight Hours & Minutes/ Day |
+7h 04' |
+4h 18' |
+0h 46' |
-2h 57' |
-6h 13' |
-7h 57' |
-7h 10' |
-4h 18' |
-0h 40' |
+3h 03' |
+6h 18' |
+7h 58' |
|
0h 00' |
| Sun altitude at solar noon on the 21st day (°) |
+53.7 |
+35.1 |
+13.6 |
-9.7 |
-26.3 |
-32.8 |
-26.9 |
-10.2 |
+12.6 |
+35.2 |
+53.6 |
+60.8 |
| +13.3 |
There are so many comparison pages. Please post a link to one to help people find them:
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Pine River Dam, Mn, Usa
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Mount Pleasant, Mi, Usa
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Karasjok, Norway
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Batesville, Ms, Usa
Vitebsk vs Prague, Czech Republic
Vitebsk vs Santiago R., Dominican Republic
Vitebsk vs Sao Joaquim, Brazil
Vitebsk vs Zagreb, Croatia
Markovo vs San Juan/ Isla Verde Arp, Pr
Mandalgovi vs Coxim
Badin vs Fond Du Lac, Wi
Almaty vs Owensboro, Ky
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Vitebsk Discussion
You are welcome to incorporate your thoughts on the differences in climate or other matters such as contrasts in culture, standard of living, demographics etc.
|